Showing posts with label London Underground. Show all posts
Showing posts with label London Underground. Show all posts

Friday, 26 November 2010

Introduction

*Note, this was written on June 22nd 2009*

It’s approaching 10 PM on a Monday night and, despite the time of year it hasn’t been what you would describe as an exceptional summer’s day. It has been warm enough to mean that leaving home that morning without a coat or jumper isn’t being regretted at this late stage in the day, even by the Thames which can be a degree or two cooler. With the longest day of the year a mere 24 hours earlier, the last knockings of daylight are fading into a very pleasant London night and I’m walking along by the river, on my way back to Waterloo train station after a visit to the
Shakespeare’s Globe on the Southbank. Although my latest career digression has taken me into the world of arts marketing, this is a rare, non-work related theatre visit for me, and my first ever to the world-famous Globe.

It’s busy here, but not packed, although the bars and restaurants appear to have had another good night, the credit crunch which left a cloud of doom over the city just a mile or so downstream doesn’t seem to be having much of a negative impact on the Southbank. There’s a fresh breeze coming off a tidal Thames turning what could have been a rather stuffy night into one with a very comfortable atmosphere. The blue and white lights strung from the trees coupled with the dying embers of daytime and the London Eye lit up in green added to a backdrop of buildings old and new creates a setting that makes my group of three think, were we tourists we’d probably be saying what a fantastic place London is on a night like this. We certainly enjoy the moment, but keep on walking, keep on walking back to Waterloo, one of the busiest train stations in Britain, the place where a matter of ours earlier the relaxed vibe would have been totally obliterated by another London rush hour, Waterloo is carnage at 6 O’clock on a week night!

Such franticness returns to my world a matter of hours later as I join the rat race once again, I would point out though that frantic isn’t something I partake in, I refuse to run for a tube or bus when there’s another along in a few minutes. I don’t understand why people work up a sweat before they’ve even got onto one of those lovely tubes with no air con. For a lucky few that will soon be something of the past though, as it’s announced today that London Underground are to begin engineering trials for nearly 200 air conditioned trains.

Among the other headlines Londoners are going to work to on this particular morning are that at least 81 conservation areas in the Capital are at risk of losing their unique characteristics, so say
English Heritage. Meanwhile the
London Assembly bring us the happy thought that new businesses in London are more likely to fail than anywhere else in England, with that kind of stress awaiting them, you’d think people would prefer to be a little more calm on their commute, truth be told, most are programmed to do the same thing, at the same time, in the same order, five days a week, which is why tempers go walkies so quickly. Yet this is the same city which, a matter of hours earlier, at the end of the day, seemed so appealing. Maybe it was the organic cider with an alcohol content of 6.5 per cent which made the difference, or maybe, it’s all about doing something which will be encouraged in work places across London today, one of those horrible business speak phrases “thinking outside the box”.

During the day I check the
Time Out website to see what they recommend for a Tuesday night out. I could have gone to see
The Low Anthem at Union Chapel, I confess I wasn’t especially familiar with their work but the blurb enthuses “pastoral, bucolic, rootsily countrified Americana for Fleet Foxes fans with this waves-making trio from Providence, Rhode Island” – clear as mud as they say. Alternatively I could have taken in a
Guy Bourdin exhibition titled 'Unseen' which “comprises over 30 images from the late fashion photographer's estate, including shoe campaign shoots and Vogue covers” … not really my cup of tea if I’m honest, I could have gone back to the Globe to see ‘As You Like It’ in the outdoor theatre (which did look rather appealing the previous evening) or there was the option of ‘Comedy Camp’ which was held in “this straight-friendly gay club”: just another varied night in the UK’s biggest city where anything’s possible. In reality I was late leaving work and endured a partly suspended District line due to a “passenger incident”, not that I had any intention of venturing out two school nights in a row. At least I had the memory of that cool breeze blowing off the tidal Thames, the fading light even at 10 O’clock at night, the walk in what was surprisingly fresh air for London and that organic cider to keep me company, something which I suspect most on my train couldn’t say, instead having to enjoy the journalistic talents of those employed by one of the many free newspapers which, until the demise of all but the Metro and the
Evening Standard’s revised business plan, would get forced into your hand, whether you already had one or not. Newspapers that paint a range of pictures of the city we live in, the everyday ups and downs of working and living, alongside the removed world of the celeb culture which dominates the media: who’s been seen where, doing what, with whom, wearing what (or what they’re not wearing), living “the life” which, apparently, the average working person is fascinated by as a form of escapism from their own world, assuming that is they’re lucky enough to have work in their world at all.

And there’s a question to consider, certainly needing more than a twenty-minute suspension on the tube to do justice to. Their world, the world in which the people around me live, be that the tangible, locational stuff, buildings, communities, boroughs, or the world they create for themselves given the cards they’re dealt. There’s a multitude of questions, topics and issues that can be thrown into the air, beginning with words like what, when, where, why, who and how, many more can be added with the addition of the word ‘not’. All provoked by the starting point of one, small, six letter word: London.

For all that those questions are interesting, and at times I hope to find some answers, the most interesting question is in fact not a question at all, but merely a word, that six letter word in fact. Gaining a greater appreciation and understanding of that will, I hope, be the really interesting bit.

So why am I writing all this stuff anyway?

Stats are one thing, but I'm far more interested in the human side.

Having looked up a load of numbers, I conducted my own, small and distinctly unscientific stab at research. I wanted to play a quick game with a few friends and work colleagues, asking a couple of questions about the city I was born in, to get an idea of the impression people have of London, to go alongside the factual, numbers-based stuff.

If I say the word London, what word or words instantly come into your head?

And, what would you say is the most famous thing about London?

In answer to the first question, those living and or working here offered up cosmopolitan, polluted, crowded, lively, noisy, the river, the most culturally diverse city in Britain, Soho, mental, dirty and inaccessible. In an interesting conflict of perspectives I also got beautiful on a summer’s day and grey, both are true, depending on the time of year and your own mood.

Those from elsewhere in the UK gave me multi-cultural, busy, crowded, fast, polluted, Westminster, diverse and also the fact that it’s a pain in the arse to get around late at night given that the tube shuts down before most clubs and bars chuck out. Amusingly, cockney wankers was also thrown in for good measure, glad to see London/Manchester relations are alive and well.

Regarding what is most famous about this city, those living here suggested the Tube, Buckingham Palace, Big Ben, the London bus, taxis, Oxford Street, Tower Bridge, people scattered on the steps of St. Paul's, tourists clogging up the streets, men in pinstriped suits, Emo kids, the Queen’s guards wearing their gigantic bear skins, the Thames, London’s profile around the world and the amount of famous old buildings here.

Outsiders first thought of, Buckingham Palace (a few times in fact), Big Ben, Houses of Parliament, the London Eye, Wembley Stadium, the West End, the monarchy, it’s music scene, the Olympics and the Tower of London. One contribution from Australia did wonder, with a touch of gloating perhaps, “Why didn’t I think of gorgeous blondes in swim suits?”

These answers do, as was partly the intention, give us an interesting, perception verses reality contrast. Seeking the help of an online dictionary, I checked out the definitions of both:

Perception is, recognition and interpretation of sensory stimuli based chiefly on memory, or, if you prefer, the neurological processes by which such recognition and interpretation are effected. In a nutshell, insight, intuition, or knowledge gained by perceiving: no shit Sherlock.

The definition of reality is, the state of things as they are or appear to be, rather than as one might wish them to be.

Point being, the common perception of London offered up by those I asked who live and or work here leans towards the negative, we’ve all spent hours sweating on the tube or found the traffic infuriating but, the tube is only packed at certain times of the day, some of those inconvenienced during a tube strike might decide to walk part of the way to work and, were the weather to be nice, realise that London maybe isn’t quite so bad after all. Let’s face it, is being late for work or a meeting really that bad in the grand scheme of things anyway?

People from elsewhere weren’t falling over themselves to focus on the negatives, although the themes of dirty, busy and difficulty getting around were still there, more people highlighted the multi-cultural side of the city though.

In terms of the iconic side, those who live here were more likely to think of groups of people, city workers, tourists, scene kids, where those from elsewhere only thought of buildings. Both those from London and elsewhere instantly thought of the most popular tourist attractions, the postcard images. Granted this is a big part of what London is, the venue plan for the
2012 Olympics was put together partly with showing off London’s estetic strength to a world-wide TV audience. But for every Buckingham Palace there’s a quirky gallery, as attractive Oxford Street or Harrods might be, so too are the intriguing markets which are slightly off the beaten track. A football fan will instantly think of Wembley or that shiny new place Arsenal play in, but Griffin Park (Brentford, complete with it’s pub on each corner of the ground) and Brisbane Road (Leyton Orient) although undeniably a little rough around the edges, has character too and are far less expensive to visit.

The inspiration for this book has come from an underlying interest to try and get more out of London, something which has been lerking in the back of my mind for a while. This was provoked into me actually writing a few ramblings after reading a fantastic book called ‘Pies and Prejudice’, written by one time NME journalist, current Radio 2 presenter, general media type and, crucially, bloke from the North
Stuart Maconie. He spent sometime traveling around “the North”, looking at what makes it the place that it is, the people who live there, what makes them who they are, the history of the region and, why it’s better than the South.

I read that book while on the tube, and found myself wondering if my fellow commuters would have a similar pride for London as clearly came across in Maconie’s writing about the North, how many of them would even be that aware of what was above them? This isn’t however planned to be a London equivalent, or answer back, tempting though that was on the occasions when the boot was aimed in our direction. I would in style, prefer to lean more towards my other inspiration, the
Robert Elms show on Radio London.

The BBC website describes it as “a celebration of every aspect of this tumultuous city”. The programme “revel’s in the numerous stories and characters, memories and aspirations which make this such an extraordinary place to live and work in”.

Arguably the reply to my two questions about London which summed things up the best was the one which didn’t actually answer the questions at all. Better still, it came from a Scot. Having first offered up Wembley for both (based on Celtic’s impending visit in a preseason tournament), I got, “London is far too varied and has so much to see and do that it’s really hard to think of just one thing.”

And that ultimately is the point. Although a lot of people I asked came up with similar impressions and icons, depending on their own personal tastes they would have something slightly different as a perception, be it the music scene, historical places of interest, shopping options, theatre venues or sports teams and or stadiums.

It’s difficult to say exactly where I plan to take this book, which is the attraction of writing it since, as was pointed out from North of the border, there’s so much on offer. Having a plan to rigidly stick to would be missing opportunities.

As the Robert Elms Show web page says, “we never hide the fact that London can be a difficult, expensive, noisy, dirty, sprawling mess. But we never forget that we love it,” or do we? That is, do we “never forget”? Or do we even love it in the first place? And if we don’t, why not? It is after all our home.

Tuesday, 23 November 2010

A Weekend in the City Part 2: Somerset House

The evening which followed the Banana Cabaret was another spur of the moment night out. My friend’s visit on that weekend in July 2009 had been decided fairly short notice, but a hunt through London’s gig listings told us that the excellent
Super Furry Animals were playing the Summer Series at
Somerset House and, unlike most of the other shows in that run, wasn’t yet a sell out.

With my gig reviewer hat on, I once saw Audio Bullies play a DJ set at
Spitalfields Market, one of London’s most iconic and interesting shopping areas in the East End not far from Liverpool Street station. This novel idea was part of a series of small gigs by big name acts put on by T-Mobile, another featured
The Strokes playing at the
Natural History Museum. The hat I mentioned failed to prevent the acceleration of the flu which was already setting up home inside my body, not least since this show took place in the, what may as well have been open air, two weeks before Christmas.

That minor brush with illness aside, there are few things better than seeing live entertainment outside in London, and there’s plenty of places to do so. Be it the music festivals which are held in Hyde and Victoria Park, theatre in Trafalgar Square or on the Southbank, or the outside stage at the Shakespeare Globe, the idea of a summertime midnight matinee does sound very appealing.

Without doubt one of the finest of any venue in London, be that regular or one which has been created within another space, is Somerset House. This historic building in its current guise stands on the site of a palace built in 1545 for Edward Seymour, Duke of Somerset. It fell into disrepair and was demolished in 1775, making way for what we see today. Many organisations and societies have occupied space at Somerset House throughout its long and intriguing history; the board of the Inland Revenue still use parts of it today, having first moved there in 1789. In the centre is a giant courtyard which hosts concerts and film screenings in the summer, and is the home for one of London’s most popular ice rinks during the winter.

Now one of London’s most eye-catching entertainment venues, Somerset House has been at the heart of English history throughout its existence. The riverside and Strand, due to their location, had been popular spots for London residences of those seeking influence at Westminster Court since the 12th century. The bishops of Chester, Exeter, Norwich, Worcester and Durham all had homes here, I dare say these were all on a far grander scale than the London flats our money grabbing friends in politics have as second homes nowadays: I suspect they’d laugh in the face of an ornamental duckhouse as well!

In the same way as now, when one footballer buys a house in Cobham and the rest all move in too, or trendy celebs try to be within staggering distance of Camden, by the 1500s these bishops had been joined by houses belonging to the King and Queen, plus the Dukes of Norfolk, Suffolk and Richmond.

When Henry VIII died in 1547 his son, Edward VI, was still too young to become king. Just as in the
Lion King, when Scar seizes the moment of the throne successor still being a kid to get his paws on the crown, Edward Seymour, Edward’s ambitious uncle, jumped on this opportunity and had himself created Lord Protector and Duke of Somerset. Just in case you think you missed a bit in history lessons, Edward VI didn’t run away and hang out with a skunk and a warthog, only to return sometime later and reclaim his kingdom in a heroic action scene, the climax of which soundtracked by
Sir Elton John.

The new Duke and Protector decided he needed a house suitable of his newly found status, when in Rome and all that, and vowed to build himself such a place.

In 1547 work began on Somerset House, Seymour already owned the land, however clearing the site meant the demolition of a number of churches and chapels, something which didn’t exactly please his religious neighbours. To say that this was an extremely unpopular and provocative move is an understatement, it caused a clash with the ruling Privy Council and was the subject of the indictment that led to the Duke's arrest and brief imprisonment in the Tower of London in 1549.

You don’t have the sort of power Seymour had gained for nothing and he soon obtained his release and reinstatement. Somerset House was virtually completed by 1551 and, although he had commissioned one of the most influential buildings of the English Renaissance, the Duke had little opportunity to enjoy the place for another brush with the authorities came in the same year. His opponents had him arrested again and tried for the much more serious crime of treason.

This time there was no escape and the Duke of Somerset, Lord Protector of England, was executed on Tower Hill in January 1552.

The building became property of the crown, although once Elizabeth I became queen in 1558 she preferred to live at either Whitehall or St. James’s.

Somerset House got its first real taste of the entertainment world during the 1600s. James I of England and VI of Scotland’s wife Anne of Denmark and Norway found life north of the border rather dull and was given Somerset House, renaming it Denmark House. Anne encouraged the development of the English masque - a form of dramatic and musical entertainment, employing Ben Jonson to write and Inigo Jones to design the sets for a series of extravagant productions.

A further piece of historical interest surrounding this building occurred after Charles I came to the throne in 1625. Later that year he married Henrietta Maria of France, a devout Roman Catholic, who shortly after became entitled to Denmark House. We’ve all seen cases of when someone supports their other half in doing something which doesn’t endear them to others, but to say the least, the building of a Roman Catholic chapel within a royal palace certainly pissed a few folks off, adding fuel to the beginnings of the ill-will which would ultimately lead to the King’s downfall and head removal.

The 18th century saw the return of Somerset House as a place for entertainment, hosting the extremely popular masked ball which was either a private event, or one where any member of the public who could afford to attend were able to buy a ticket. Fancy dress was an absolute requirement, if only this happened now. Picture the scene, at one of the Queen’s Buckingham Palace garden parties, there’s Prince Charles looking thoroughly uncomfortable with the idea of wearing a Santa hat, meanwhile over at City Hall, Boris Johnson, being the wacky funster that he is, has thrown himself headlong into the occasion by dressing up as a dalek, and the GLA’s soul BNP representative is failing to convince people he’s come as Snow White as that’s his favourite Disney film, as everyone knows he’s hijacked the Mayor’s fancy dress drinks reception to remind the world of his parties position on immigration.

Think of the fun the tabloids would have if suits were replaced by animal costumes. the Somerset House website has a couple of interesting descriptions of the Masked Ball from the media of the day, the spectator talked of how "People dress themselves in what they have a Mind to be, and not what they are fit for", while this, unaccredited snapshot of the occasion described one woman’s appearance as “Iphigeneia for the sacrifice, but so naked the high priest might easily inspect the entrails of the victim”. God knows what they’d make of the lack of clothing you’d find on the red carpet of Leicester Square film premiers!

I’ve been to Somerset House twice, and on both occasions seen the same band, Super Furry Animals, as part of the annual Summer Series, which in the past has hosted performances from Kasabian, Pendulum, Lily Allen, Unkle and The Blue Nile. The crowd at a Super Furry Animals gig doesn’t really go for fancy dress, and this night in July wasn’t warm enough to prompt anyone in attendance to wear the kind of clothing to allow for entrale inspection, but a damn fine time was had none the less. The Welsh band fit in perfectly here, quirky, intriguing and ultimately creating an uplifting experience, the only downer on the night was the ridiculous bar prices: £4 for a pint of Carling, are you having a giraffe!

One of the reasons for why Somerset House is such a popular venue is, despite being right in the centre of London, once you’ve walked through the gate and left the Strand behind, you can easily forget about the world outside. Something which for many was more than welcome the previous time I saw Super Furry Animals in this venue, for it was the night following the day of the
July bombings on public transport in 2005. It was a surreal evening, having a beer in the riverside bar in the sunshine, while police helicopters circled over head. They were still there as we walked back to Waterloo, and yes, had our route home required it, getting on the underground just over 24 hours after three trains had been blown up wouldn’t have concerned me in the slightest. People from elsewhere in the UK in the weeks after often asked me, “so are you nervous about using the tube?” The answer, for me at least, was a resounding no. Because the tube is such an integral part of how this city functions, it was important London dusted itself down and carried on as soon as possible. There was talk that this gig would have been canceled, the R.E.M show I was due to go to in Hyde Park the following night was moved back a week.

My other abiding memory from the night in 2005, on a much lighter note, was a reviewer who, at the time was writing for the Independent, holding court in the toilets showing off pictures on his phone.
Live 8 was still fresh in the memory and he was proudly telling his companion about the night he’d had, backed up by a photo of “when I was standing at the side of the stage while The Who were playing”. Not for the first time in this building’s prestigious history would people have been boasting about being in with the in crowd.